![]() ![]() Fewer Requests for Comments (RFCs): The specifications for IKE were covered in at least three RFCs, more if one takes into account NAT traversal and other extensions that are in common use.The IKEv2 protocol was described in Appendix A of RFC 4306 in 2005. ( February 2009) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) There might be a discussion about this on the talk page. This section may be confusing or unclear to readers. The IKE specifications were open to a significant degree of interpretation, bordering on design faults ( Dead Peer Detection being a case in point ), giving rise to different IKE implementations not being able to create an agreed-upon security association at all for many combinations of options, however correctly configured they might appear at either end. Further complications arose from the fact that in many implementations the debug output was difficult to interpret, if there was any facility to produce diagnostic output at all. Consequently, both sides of an IKE had to exactly agree on the type of security association they wanted to create – option by option – or a connection could not be established. Originally, IKE had numerous configuration options but lacked a general facility for automatic negotiation of a well-known default case that is universally implemented. The negotiation results in a minimum of two unidirectional security associations (one inbound and one outbound). ĭuring IKE phase two, the IKE peers use the secure channel established in Phase 1 to negotiate Security Associations on behalf of other services like IPsec. Main Mode protects the identity of the peers and the hash of the shared key by encrypting them Aggressive Mode does not. Phase 1 operates in either Main Mode or Aggressive Mode. The authentication can be performed using either pre-shared key (shared secret), signatures, or public key encryption. This negotiation results in one single bi-directional ISAKMP security association. IKE phase one's purpose is to establish a secure authenticated communication channel by using the Diffie–Hellman key exchange algorithm to generate a shared secret key to encrypt further IKE communications. IKEv1 consists of two phases: phase 1 and phase 2. Implementations vary on how the interception of the packets is done-for example, some use virtual devices, others take a slice out of the firewall, etc. The IPsec stack, in turn, intercepts the relevant IP packets if and where appropriate and performs encryption/decryption as required. For instance, this could be an AES key, information identifying the IP endpoints and ports that are to be protected, as well as what type of IPsec tunnel has been created. The negotiated key material is then given to the IPsec stack. The IKE protocol uses UDP packets, usually on port 500, and generally requires 4–6 packets with 2–3 round trips to create an ISAKMP security association (SA) on both sides. Kernel modules, on the other hand, can process packets efficiently and with minimum overhead-which is important for performance reasons. User-space daemons have easy access to mass storage containing configuration information, such as the IPsec endpoint addresses, keys and certificates, as required. Most IPsec implementations consist of an IKE daemon that runs in user space and an IPsec stack in the kernel that processes the actual IP packets. The parent organization of the IETF, the Internet Society (ISOC), has maintained the copyrights of these standards as freely available to the Internet community. A later update upgraded the document from Proposed Standard to Internet Standard, published as RFC 7296 in October 2014. RFC 5996 combined these two documents plus additional clarifications into the updated IKEv2, published in September 2010. RFC 4718 clarified some open details in October 2006. RFC 4306 updated IKE to version two (IKEv2) in December 2005. RFC 2409 defined the Internet Key Exchange (IKE).RFC 2408 defined the Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP).RFC 2407 defined the Internet IP Security Domain of Interpretation for ISAKMP.The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) originally defined IKE in November 1998 in a series of publications ( Request for Comments) known as RFC 2407, RFC 2408 and RFC 2409: In addition, a security policy for every peer which will connect must be manually maintained. ![]() IKE uses X.509 certificates for authentication ‒ either pre-shared or distributed using DNS (preferably with DNSSEC) ‒ and a Diffie–Hellman key exchange to set up a shared session secret from which cryptographic keys are derived. IKE builds upon the Oakley protocol and ISAKMP. In computing, Internet Key Exchange ( IKE, sometimes IKEv1 or IKEv2, depending on version) is the protocol used to set up a security association (SA) in the IPsec protocol suite. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |